About SWoRD
Get Started
New Account
Student FAQ
Instructor FAQ
Research
About Us
Contact

Research and Development Statement

The SWoRD teams at the University of Pittsburgh and at the University of Missouri, Columbia perform empirical investigations to improve writing and reviewing.

Publications and Presentations

  • Cho, K., Schunn, C., & Wilson, R. (2006). Validity and Reliability of Scaffolded Peer Assessment of Writing from Instructor and Student Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 891-901. [PDF] 
  • Cho, K., Schunn, C., & Charney, D. (2006). Commenting on writing: Typology and perceived helpfulness of comments from novice peer reviewers and subject matter experts. Written Communication, 23(3), 260-294. [PDF] 
  • Cho, K., Chung, R., King, W., & Schunn, C. D. (in press). Creating a peer-based computer-supported knowledge refinement process. Communications of the ACM. [PDF]
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2007). Scaffolded Writing and Rewriting in the Discipline: A Web-based Reciprocal Peer Review System. Computers and Education, 48(3), 409-426. [PDF] 
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2006). Does writing improve as a function of number of reviewers. Proceedings of the 28th Annual COnference of Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada. LEA. 
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (under review). Optimal number of raters for agreement and performance.
  • Cho, K., Chung, R., King, W., & Schunn, C. D. (2006). Creating Peer-Based Knowledge Refineries. Proceedings of 2006 Academy of Management Meeting, August 11-16, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Chung, R., Bateman, P., & Cho, K. (2005). Expertise gaps and profiles: An integrated view of expertise on knowledge transfer. Proceedings of IS-CORE 2005 Workshop of International Conference of Information Systems, Dec 11-14 2005. Las Vegas
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2004). Scaffolded writing and reviewing in the discipline. Proceedings of IEEE iCALT, Joensuu, Finland.
  • Schunn, C., & Cho, K. (2003). Proceedings of EARLI.
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2004). You write better when you get feedback from multiple peers than from an expert. Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference of Cognitive Science Society, Chicago. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. (2003). Successful factors in networked collaboration. In the Proceedings of the 25th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2003). Battling the tyranny of the thousands with a SWoRD: Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline. ED-Media 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2003). Validity and Reliability of Peer Assessments with a Missing Data Estimation Technique. In the Proceedings of ED-Media 2003 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Cho, K., & Schunn, C. D. (2003). Demonstration of SWoRD: Scaffolded writing and rewriting in the discipline. In the Proceedings of ED-Media 2003 Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.
  • Schunn, C. D., & Cho, K. (2002). A web-based system for reciprocal evaluation of student paper writing. Paper presented at the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Society for Computers in Psychology. Kansas City, MO (November, 2002).
  •   Funded by the Andrew Mellon Foundation and the University of Pittsburgh Provost Office
      Copyright ¨Ï 2002-2006 Univ. of Pittsburgh